JSA Template — Job Safety Analysis Template (Editable Word)

If you want to start from a completed document rather than a blank grid, our Job Safety Analysis (JSA) Template is an editable Word file built around a fully worked task analysis — sequential steps, hazards, before-and-after risk ratings, hierarchy-tagged controls, PPE, training and a worker sign-on register, with a state-specific legal context section for every Australian jurisdiction.

Trade-specific versions are also available, each with the steps and hazards of that trade already analysed: Electrical, Confined Space Entry, Plumbing, Concreting, Crane & Lifting, Forklift, Working at Heights, Asbestos Removal, Welding & Hot Work, Carpentry and Excavation. Every template is a one-off purchase at $99, inclusive of GST, and covers all eight states and territories.

A good JSA template captures eleven key elements, and every free template worth using should include all of them. The first element is a header block identifying the company, the workplace, the date, the preparer's name and role, and the project or contract reference. Without this information, the JSA is untethered from a specific job and cannot serve as an evidence-of-process record. The second element is a task description written in plain language and specific enough to identify exactly what work will be performed. Install fluorescent light fitting in office ceiling, Level 2, Room 204 is specific enough to be useful. Electrical work is not.

The third element is a location and date block capturing where and when the JSA applies. The fourth element is a list of people involved in the task, including names, roles, and trade qualifications where relevant. This matters because a JSA is intended to be used by specific workers on a specific task, not by anonymous labour. The fifth element is the task steps in sequential order, numbered and written in the order the task will actually be performed. This is the backbone of the JSA — if the steps are wrong or out of order, the hazard identification at each step will be wrong.

The sixth element is the hazards identified at each step, written specifically for that step rather than as general hazards. Hazards at step three are different from hazards at step five, and the template should force the user to consider each step separately. The seventh element is a risk rating at each step using a 5x5 matrix with likelihood and consequence ratings, recorded both before and after controls are applied. This before-and-after format is what demonstrates that the controls actually reduce the risk.

The eighth element is the control measures for each hazard, written as specific actions that can be verified by a supervisor, rather than vague instructions such as be careful or use PPE appropriately. The ninth element is the PPE requirements listed with Australian Standard references, for example steel-cap boots to AS/NZS 2210.3, safety glasses to AS/NZS 1337.1, insulated gloves rated to 1,000 volts AC to AS/NZS 2225. The tenth element is emergency contacts including site-specific first aid, muster point, and nearest hospital. The eleventh element is worker signatures or acknowledgements as evidence that every worker on the task has read and understood the JSA before starting work. A good template also includes a review date and trigger conditions — when this JSA will be reviewed and what events trigger an immediate review such as an incident, a near miss, a change in scope, or a change in crew.

JSA and SWMS templates are often confused because they perform similar functions, but the structural differences matter. A JSA template is organised around task steps. The document lists the steps in sequence and attaches hazards and controls to each step. A SWMS template is organised around hazards. The document lists all the hazards associated with an entire work activity and attaches controls to each hazard, without necessarily walking the reader through the steps of the task. Both approaches have merit, and both appear in the Australian safety documentation market.

The JSA approach is best for tasks that have a clear sequence of steps and where hazards vary significantly between steps. A switchboard isolation procedure has different hazards at the notification step, the identification step, the LOTO application step, the test-for-dead step, and the re-energisation step. A JSA captures these differences naturally because the document structure walks through the steps. A SWMS approach would aggregate all the hazards under a single header and lose the step-by-step detail.

The SWMS approach is best for work activities that have multiple concurrent hazards and where the hierarchy of controls needs to be applied systematically to each hazard. A roofing activity has fall hazards, electrical hazards from overhead lines, manual handling hazards, and heat stress hazards, all of which can occur concurrently. A SWMS structure that lists each hazard and applies hierarchy-tagged controls is more useful than a step-by-step sequence that would need to repeat the same hazards at multiple steps.

For high-risk construction work, the SWMS is legally mandated and the JSA is supplementary. A JSA cannot replace a SWMS for HRCW. However, many contractors use both — the SWMS provides the activity-level overview, and the JSA drills into specific high-consequence tasks within the SWMS scope. A SWMS for electrical work might be accompanied by JSAs for the switchboard isolation, the cable pulling, and the energisation testing tasks within that scope. Each document serves its own purpose without duplicating the other.

Unlike a SWMS, a JSA is not a legislated document in Australia, so the requirements do not vary substantially between states and territories. Safe Work Australia provides general risk management guidance that applies across all jurisdictions, and the state and territory regulators publish risk assessment guides that are broadly consistent with each other. A JSA template that works for New South Wales also works for Queensland, Victoria, Western Australia, South Australia, Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory, and the Northern Territory.

That said, each state regulator publishes general risk management guidance that may inform the content of a JSA. SafeWork NSW publishes risk management guidance under the Work Health and Safety Regulation 2025 (NSW), which commenced 22 August 2025. Workplace Health and Safety Queensland offers similar guidance aligned with the Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (QLD). WorkSafe Victoria has risk assessment templates and guides aligned with the Occupational Health and Safety Regulations 2017 (VIC). WorkSafe WA publishes guidance aligned with the Work Health and Safety (General) Regulations 2022 (WA). SafeWork SA, WorkSafe Tasmania, WorkSafe ACT, and NT WorkSafe each publish equivalent guidance for their jurisdictions.

For a SWMS specifically, the state variations matter because the Regulation differs in detail between jurisdictions and the SWMS content requirements are prescribed. For a JSA, the variations are much smaller because the document is voluntary and the methodology — break the task into steps, identify hazards, set controls — is essentially the same nationally. A JSA template based on the Safe Work Australia national model risk management guidance will serve any Australian workplace without needing state-specific adaptation.

Industry-specific JSA templates are a different matter. A JSA template for electrical work is naturally different from a JSA template for confined space entry, even though both follow the same methodology. The differences are in the hazards listed, the controls recommended, and the Australian Standards referenced. Many organisations maintain a library of JSA templates organised by task type rather than by state, and this is usually the more useful taxonomy for field use.

If the user has downloaded a blank JSA template, the following walkthrough explains how to fill it in properly. This sequence produces a document that meets industry good practice and will stand up to inspection.

Start with the header. Fill in the company name, the Australian Business Number, the date, the site address, and the name and role of the person preparing the JSA. This anchors the document to a specific job at a specific place and establishes accountability for the content.

Write the task description specifically. Position barricades around excavation zone, place signage at entry points, lay out tools and materials is specific enough to identify sub-steps with different hazards. Set up work area is too vague to attach hazards to. If the user cannot picture someone doing the task while reading the description, the description is too vague.

List the steps in sequence. The most common mistake is writing steps that are too broad. Install fitting should be broken down into: turn off power at switchboard, test circuit for dead with voltage tester, remove existing fitting, connect wiring to new fitting, secure fitting to mounting bracket, re-energise circuit and test. Each of those sub-steps has different hazards that need different controls. Typical JSAs have six to twelve steps. Fewer than four usually indicates the task is too broad. More than fifteen usually indicates the task needs to be split into sub-tasks.

Identify hazards at each step. Ask what could go wrong here, not what could go wrong in general. Turn off power at switchboard has different hazards from connect wiring to new fitting. Name each hazard specifically — contact with live terminal if wrong circuit isolated is useful, whereas electrocution is too vague to drive specific controls. The more specific the hazard, the more specific the control can be.

Write controls for each hazard. Every control should be an action that someone can do and someone can verify. Test circuit with CAT IV voltage tester before touching any conductor is verifiable by inspection. Be careful is not. Each control should be expressed in active voice and should reference a specific action, standard, or verification method.

Rate the risk. Use a 5x5 matrix — likelihood times consequence — both before controls are applied and after. This demonstrates that the controls actually make a measurable difference. A hazard with a pre-control rating of high and a post-control rating of low is evidence that the controls are effective. A hazard with the same rating before and after the controls suggests either the controls are inadequate or the rating is inconsistent.

List PPE with Australian Standard references. Not gloves but insulated gloves rated to 1,000 volts AC to AS/NZS 2225. Not safety boots but steel-cap boots to AS/NZS 2210.3. Not safety glasses but medium-impact safety glasses to AS/NZS 1337.1. Not a respirator but a P2 particulate respirator to AS/NZS 1716. Standard references make compliance verifiable and demonstrate that the preparer has considered the applicable technical requirements.

Get everyone to sign. Print the JSA, brief the crew, and get signatures before work commences.

A worked example shows what a completed JSA looks like in practice. The following walk-through covers a common maintenance task that triggers multiple hazards at different steps.

Task: Replacing a fluorescent light fitting in an office ceiling. Location: Level 2, Room 204, 88 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW.

Step 1: Isolate circuit at switchboard. Hazard: wrong circuit isolated, leaving the fitting energised. Control: identify the circuit from the switchboard schedule, apply a lock-out tag-out device, test the fitting with a non-contact voltage tester to confirm isolation. Risk after controls: low.

Step 2: Set up step ladder below fitting. Hazard: ladder on uneven floor or slippery surface. Control: inspect floor surface before positioning, place ladder on level ground, use a ladder with non-slip feet, maintain three points of contact while on the ladder. Risk after controls: low.

Step 3: Remove diffuser and fluorescent tubes. Hazard: glass breakage, mercury exposure from a broken tube. Control: handle tubes carefully with both hands, place removed tubes in a protective sleeve immediately, have a mercury spill kit available within 5 metres. Risk after controls: low.

Step 4: Disconnect wiring from existing fitting. Hazard: residual electrical charge in the fitting. Control: test for dead at the fitting terminals with a voltage tester before touching any wiring, wear insulated gloves rated to 1,000 volts AC to AS/NZS 2225. Risk after controls: low.

Step 5: Install new fitting and reconnect wiring. Hazard: incorrect wiring causing a short circuit or earth fault. Control: follow the manufacturer wiring diagram, verify conductor identification (active, neutral, earth) before connecting, torque connections to the manufacturer specification. Risk after controls: low.

Step 6: Re-energise circuit and test. Hazard: short circuit on re-energisation, arc flash. Control: ensure the circuit breaker is correctly rated, stand to the side of the switchboard when re-energising rather than directly in front, test the fitting operation before removing the ladder. Risk after controls: low.

PPE for the entire task: safety glasses to AS/NZS 1337.1, insulated gloves to AS/NZS 2225, steel-cap boots to AS/NZS 2210.3, standard work clothing with long sleeves. Emergency contacts: site first aid officer on internal extension 2000, nearest hospital Royal Prince Alfred, emergency muster point at the ground floor fire stair.

This worked example demonstrates how a JSA captures the hazards at each step rather than lumping them all together. A worker reading the JSA before starting work knows exactly what to watch for at each point in the task and exactly which controls are in place. The document is short, readable, and directly connected to the work being performed.