Hexavalent Chromium Work SWMS: ALARP Controls for an NTGC with No Safe Level
Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] is one of the most potent occupational carcinogens in the Australian workplace. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies Cr(VI) compounds as Group 1 carcinogens — a confirmed cause of lung cancer and nasal/sinus cancer in humans. On 1 December 2026, Safe Work Australia will reclassify Cr(VI) as a Non-Threshold Genotoxic Carcinogen (NTGC), replacing the existing numerical Workplace Exposure Limit with an ALARP (as low as reasonably practicable) requirement. This is a fundamental shift in the legal framework: there is no longer a threshold below which Cr(VI) exposure is deemed acceptable, and every practicable reduction in exposure becomes a legal obligation, not a best-practice aspiration. Hexavalent chromium arises in Australian workplaces from a predictable set of operations. Stainless steel welding is the single largest source — the fume from welding austenitic and ferritic stainless steels (grades 304, 316, 316L, 2205) contains Cr(VI) at concentrations that regularly exceed the former WEL without LEV. Hard chrome electroplating generates Cr(VI) mist and aerosol at the plating bath surface. Thermal spray coating of chromium-containing alloys, chromate conversion coating, chrome paint removal by abrasive blasting or grinding, and chromate surface treatment all present significant Cr(VI) exposures. Construction workers encounter Cr(VI) in Portland cement, particularly during wet concrete operations — Cr(VI) in cement is soluble and can cause both chromate sensitisation and dermal absorption. The NTGC reclassification means that stainless steel welders, platers, and painters who work with chromate-containing materials must now demonstrate that exposure has been reduced to the minimum achievable level — not merely to a number. This requires quantified exposure monitoring, engineering controls verified against their design specification, health surveillance, and documented ALARP assessments reviewed when circumstances change. This SWMS is developed in accordance with the WHS Regulations 2017 (Part 7.1 — Hazardous Chemicals), the revised Workplace Exposure Standards for Airborne Contaminants (SWA, effective 1 December 2026), the Model Code of Practice: Managing Risks of Hazardous Chemicals in the Workplace, the Model Code of Practice: Welding Processes, and Safe Work Australia's specific Cr(VI) NTGC guidance. It must be customised for the specific site, process, and materials used, and reviewed with workers before use.
SWMS variants reference your state’s WHS legislation. Instant download after payment.
Legal Requirements
WHS Regulations 2017, Part 7.1 (Hazardous Chemicals), regulations 356–383 (Health monitoring); Workplace Exposure Standards for Airborne Contaminants (SWA, amended effective 1 December 2026): Cr(VI) reclassified as NTGC — ALARP obligation replaces numerical WEL
Category 10 — Work involving hazardous material or a contaminated area (WHS Regulation r291(1)(j)); Cr(VI) compounds are Schedule 10 hazardous chemicals with mandatory health surveillance under r356 (IARC Group 1 carcinogen)
Model Code of Practice: Managing Risks of Hazardous Chemicals in the Workplace (SWA 2021); Model Code of Practice: Welding Processes (SWA 2020); Safe Work Australia: NTGC Framework and ALARP Assessment Guidance (2026)
true
Hazards
| Hazard | Consequence | Likelihood |
|---|---|---|
| Inhalation of Cr(VI) fume during welding, cutting, or grinding of stainless steel and chrome alloys | Stainless steel welding generates Cr(VI)-containing fume at concentrations routinely 10–100 times the former WEL without LEV. Inhaled Cr(VI) causes DNA strand breaks, chromosomal aberrations, and is a direct-acting carcinogen at the bronchial epithelium. Long-term exposure causes lung cancer (IARC Group 1, latency 10–30 years), nasal septum ulceration and perforation, sinusitis, and obstructive lung disease. There is no dose below which the carcinogenic risk is zero under the NTGC framework — every preventable exposure increment matters. | Almost Certain (A) without on-gun LEV during stainless steel welding |
| Inhalation of Cr(VI) mist and aerosol from hard chrome electroplating baths | Chrome plating baths operate at elevated temperatures with chromic acid (CrO3) as the electrolyte. The electrolytic process generates hydrogen gas bubbles that carry chromic acid mist to the bath surface. Without rim ventilation capturing ≥95% of mist at the bath edge, platers are exposed to Cr(VI) concentrations far exceeding the former WEL. The NTGC reclassification means the remaining 5% of residual mist must also be minimised through enhanced engineering controls and respiratory protection. | Almost Certain (A) without effective rim LEV on chrome plating tanks |
| Skin contact with Cr(VI) compounds causing chromate sensitisation and chromate dermatitis | Cr(VI) compounds are potent skin sensitisers. A single episode of sensitisation via skin contact — typically through plating solution splash, chromate-treated surface contact, or wet concrete — permanently sensitises the worker. Subsequent exposures, even at trace concentrations, trigger Type IV hypersensitivity (allergic contact dermatitis) requiring permanent removal from Cr(VI) work environments. Chromate dermatitis is one of the most common occupational skin diseases in Australia. | Likely (B) without chemical-resistant gloves and strict hygiene controls during plating operations |
| Inhalation of Cr(VI) dust during abrasive blasting, grinding, or sanding of chromate-coated surfaces or chrome paint | Abrasive removal of chromate conversion coatings, chrome primer, or chrome paint generates fine Cr(VI)-containing dust at high concentrations. Unlike welding fume (which is captured by LEV at the source), dry grinding and blasting operations generate aerosols that travel significant distances from the work area, placing both the operator and bystanders at risk. Chrome paint removal is a particular exposure risk on infrastructure, aerospace, naval, and heritage industrial assets. | Almost Certain (A) during dry abrasive operations on chromate-coated surfaces without RPE and area containment |
| Nasal septum perforation from chronic Cr(VI) exposure in chrome plating workers | Chrome platers exposed to Cr(VI) mist over months to years develop progressive nasal mucosa ulceration leading to nasal septum perforation — a characteristic and irreversible marker of excessive Cr(VI) exposure. Septal perforation indicates that systemic absorption has been substantial and that lung cancer risk is significantly elevated. It is both a sentinel health event and a prosecution trigger, as its appearance demonstrates the PCBU has failed the ALARP obligation. | Possible (C) in platers without effective rim LEV; confirmed by biological monitoring |
| Cr(VI) exposure through Cr-containing Portland cement during concrete mixing, pouring, and surface work | Portland cement contains water-soluble Cr(VI) at concentrations up to 40 mg/kg (40 ppm). Wet cement contact causes both chromate sensitisation and dermal corrosion (cement burns). Workers who handle fresh concrete daily — construction labourers, concreters, bricklayers, and plasterers — have elevated rates of chromate dermatitis and are potentially exposed to Cr(VI) via inhalation of dry cement dust during mixing. | Likely (B) during bulk cement mixing without gloves and dusty conditions |
Controls (Hierarchy of Controls)
Recent Prosecutions
A metal fabrication company had welders working on stainless steel in an enclosed workshop without on-gun LEV, relying solely on general ventilation. Personal air monitoring by the regulator found Cr(VI) fume concentrations 8–12 times the then-current WEL. Workers had no biological monitoring and no health surveillance. The company received prohibition notices, was required to engage an occupational hygienist to design and install LEV before work could resume, and was prosecuted for failure to manage the risk of hazardous chemicals.
2022 — SafeWork NSW enforcement register
Following the NTGC reclassification of Cr(VI) effective 1 December 2026, state WHS regulators conducted targeted inspection campaigns in chrome plating shops and metal fabrication facilities. Operators without current exposure monitoring demonstrating ALARP, without biological monitoring programmes, and without documented ALARP assessments face Category 1 prosecution (gross negligence — reckless disregard of NTGC carcinogen risk) under the WHS Act. The NTGC framework shifts the burden to the PCBU to prove controls are at ALARP, not for the regulator to prove they are not.
2026 — Safe Work Australia NTGC Transition Guidance
What Your SWMS Must Include
Related SWMS
SWMS templates for this work
☣️Hexavalent Chromium SWMS
Hexavalent chromium electroplating and thermal spraying — LEV engineering controls, RPE for Class 1 carcinogen…
🔥Stainless Steel Welding Fume SWMS
Stainless steel welding — hexavalent chromium (Cr VI) and nickel compound controls, LEV design, biological mon…
⚗️Chromium VI Work SWMS
Operations generating Cr(VI) compounds — stainless steel and chrome-alloy welding, hard chrome electroplating,…
Cr(VI) NTGC from 1 December 2026 — No Safe Level, ALARP Controls Required
This template pre-loads Cr(VI)-specific hazards, the NTGC ALARP obligation, LEV specifications for welding and plating, biological monitoring requirements, and IARC Group 1 carcinogen controls. CIH-reviewed, editable DOCX, 8 Australian state variants. $75 AUD.
Get Chromium VI Work SWMS — $75 →